Monday, August 31, 2020

The Risks to Children When Disaster Strikes

 The COVID-19 pandemic has been labeled a children’s disaster, with particular concern being placed on the protection of minors. In this crisis, as with other crises and disasters, children have paid a high price, with tens of millions of them affected by the lockdowns caused by the pandemic.

The majority of people impacted by disasters are children and many are also displaced due to such crises. In fact, the United Nations has declared children to be the group most affected by disasters each year. In 2018, nearly 50 million children needed protection in humanitarian settings, according to the Alliance for Child Protection in Humanitarian Action.

With COVID-19, protection systems have come under increasing strain as power imbalances become more acute, causing an increase of stress within families. This has aggravated the risk toward children who are at higher risk than other age groups of encountering violence, abuse, neglect and exploitation in disaster settings, including those disasters driven by climate change.

Top risks for girls and boys in disasters include physical, sexual and psychological violence; neglect; injuries; harmful practices, such as child, early and forced marriage; psychosocial distress and mental disorders; children becoming associated with armed conflicts and groups; child labor; malnutrition; trafficking; losing out on education; and becoming unaccompanied and separated. 

In particular, disasters often also hamper children’s access to education, health care, birth registration and other critical governmental services. The COVID-19 pandemic, in which access to education has been severely constrained, has meant that access to vital protection systems has been difficult.

Excluding Children

Having said that, all of these risks could be reduced through specific preparedness activities prior to a disaster. However, the reality of the matter is that in many cases, youth and children are excluded from planning, response and disaster risk reduction activities. In addition, despite the danger to children, their protection risks such as those related to psychosocial well-being and resilience are not well understood or documented. There is currently no global snapshot of children’s perspectives related to protection and mental health and psychosocial issues from disasters.

While international law does not explicitly refer to child protection in disasters, the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and other human rights instruments have set out rights that are applicable to all situations of crisis and that are relevant to the most important protection gaps that children face in disasters. This is true of the requirement that all actions concerning children must be taken according to the principle of the “best interest of the child.” The Convention on the Rights of the Child also enshrines each child’s right to express his or her views, and it requires that these views be given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child.

Different national contexts and legal traditions determine whether legislative, policy or planning tools (or a combination of all three) are best suited to ensure that child protection goals are achieved. However, disaster management professionals often come to their work without clear guidance on children’s rights and special needs in disasters, and thus these issues can easily be overlooked.

Hence, there needs to be clear engagement between policymakers and those professionals to ensure that measures and responsibilities for child protection are adequately formalized and adapted to meet children’s best interests. Law and policy related to children also need to reflect the varied requirements of children of different ages and abilities.

Children and Climate Change

This is of utmost urgency and importance in the wake of climate change leading to more frequent weather-related disasters. Our world is heating up. Even as so much of our lives slow down, pause or alter from the COVID-19 pandemic, the carbon in our atmosphere continues to accumulate. With it, we know that more frequent and more intense droughts, floods, fires, population movements and public health crises will continue arriving at our doorsteps.

In just the last year alone, we have seen large-scale climate-related disasters in places as diverse as Mozambique, South Asia, the Bahamas and East Africa. This will have direct impacts on children as protection systems are affected, exacerbating preexisting tensions and conflicts. This will leave children susceptible to violence, abuse, child labor, trafficking and other forms of exploitation.

Compared to boys, girls are at higher risk of experiencing many secondary impacts that arise from disasters. These include sexual and gender-based violence, the pressure to marry as children and a loss in education opportunities. These secondary impacts may be the real “disaster” for girls. The risks are due to an intersectionality of social norms and power dynamics that lead to girls having less access to, or control over, assets including the resources necessary to cope with disasters. Such assets include access to information, education, health and wealth.

As a result, girls may suffer a “double disaster.” It is the inequities in the everyday, and not just in times of disaster, that increase risk and reduce life chances for girls. Amplifying this has been the dismal investment in emergencies, with an average only $3 spent per child in need of protection for the whole of 2018.

What Can Be Done?

What the international community is doing now to protect children in disasters is clearly not enough. Too many children are being left out, left behind and being harmed. Improving the approaches that are already there will lead to some gains, but this will be nowhere near what one should expect. Thus, there is a need to do better.

There is a need to shift away from a responsive model that relies on putting out fires, hoping that the same old thinking next time will lead to different results and that humanitarians can do the heavy-lifting on our own. There is a need to move to a model that focuses on prevention. There is a need for a transformative approach.

Missing in the existing efforts — as well-intentioned as they are — has been the pursuit of genuine support to governments to develop, implement and monitor domestic laws and regulations that enable children to live in safety. This approach underlines the responsibility of governments to ensure child protection systems are in place and adequate funds are available during disasters. It also provides clarity as part of disaster preparedness on what is needed, who is responsible and what measurements need to be applied to the protection of children. This is all especially important as climate-related disasters grow in frequency, scale and impact. 

logo
Make Sense of the World
Unique insights from 2000+ contributors in 80+ countries

Supporting governments is surely not enough alone. It is not a silver bullet, and yet it is a crucial piece that has been underutilized or even missing from our collective toolbox to protect children in disasters. This includes ensuring relevant ministries and agencies are mandated to have in place contingency plans fully covering child protection. And that child protection issues should be included in relevant laws, regulations and policies on disaster risk management.

Also needed is mandating the collection and analysis of age, gender and disability-disaggregated data as part of risk assessments. This includes improving specific content in their laws and regulations, including that related to meeting children’s best interests, being gender-responsive and drawing on necessary international minimum standards.

A recently released report from the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies outlines the actions governments can take to cover key protection issues and ensure better coordinated, multi-level and interactive approaches to implementing domestic laws involving child protection. In this, there are lots to think about in addressing a vital issue in terms of child protection and disaster legislation, and much more needs to be done.


This originally appeared on Fair Observer

Friday, August 14, 2020

Celebrating International Youth Day amidst COVID-19 — The Resilience of Young People

 This year’s International Youth Day is historic. For the first time, it will be commemorated largely virtually as the COVID-19 pandemic has led to stricter physical distancing. It is also the first one this century where the world collectively is at a crossroads for the future and where the world collectively has to take a step forward. Whilst International Youth Day is often used as a stepping stone to reaffirm commitments towards engaging young people, it would be remiss not to use this opportunity to understand and reimagine what a post pandemic youth engagement can and should look like.

COVID-19 is a time to reimagine what post pandemic youth engagement can look like

As COVID-19 has shown, young people have — and will continue to have — a valuable role in the global response to and recovery from the COVID19 pandemic.

we have to be prepared for a hard shift in how we work and engage.

Friday, July 31, 2020

Celebrating ‘The Feast’ in the Age of COVID 19

 The 31st of July 2020, for most Muslims will be celebration of the Feast (or Eid ul Adha) symbolizing the culmination of the pilgrimage by Muslims to Mecca (the Hajj one of the five fundamental pillars of Islam). These few days of light and love are supposed to characterise meditation, reflection, symbolize meditation, a return to the Creator and prayers. Prayers for peace, for happiness, for justice. The Hajj serves as a symbol of unity in diversity as Malcolm X wrote “…we were all participating in the same ritual, displaying a spirit of unity and brotherhood…. I have never before seen sincere and true brotherhood practiced by all colours together, irrespective of their colour”.

It is about understanding the purpose of life’s journey.

how much will we be able to sacrifice?

getting out of the ideological box and isolationist cultural ghetto

Monday, July 13, 2020

Reimagining Volunteering after COVID

 COVID-19 has hit almost every country in the world, heavily affecting communities at all levels. What has been unprecedented has been the inability of national governments to be able to respond adequately and consistently. The gap in the response of the government has been filled by civil society manned by millions of volunteers, who despite facing the effects of the pandemic in their own lives, have stepped up to work around the clock to prevent the transmission of the virus, communicate effectively with the public, help communities already affected by the outbreak to maintain access to basic social and protective services, and reduce the economic, social and psychological impact on people. These volunteers have provided a range of services, according to needs and existing capacities, risking their lives working in this crisis with many not having access to basic health insurance, nor insurance to support their families should they be injured and unable to work or killed.

Volunteering is part of the DNA and fabric of local communities, highlighting the best that can be achieved when people come together to serve. Throughout the last 100 years or so, we have seen the tremendous good that has come about when people of their own volition have come together at times of tragedy to serve those in need. The current pandemic times are once again a reminder of that human fraternity.


Yet as we appreciate the contribution of volunteering in the age of COVID-19, we must also recognize that the concept of volunteering has evolved and needs to evolve to meet the needs of people on the ground amidst changing expectations and needs. COVID-19 has highlighted the need to really rethink volunteering.


Volunteering was always thought of as a prerogative of the privileged and elite in the 19th century: an act of charity by the better-off towards the disadvantaged. You volunteered your time because you had time to spare. In days of old, you had time to spare because you were not that focused on working or earning a living and it was the past time of the idle rich. Hence volunteering at one stage was also seen through a gendered lens because it was mainly middle- or upper-class women who were able to devote the time to ‘volunteer’.

But this concept does not match the lived experiences of many volunteers who are also members of the communities being supported as well as the experiences of many young people taking up the cause to serve the downtrodden whilst also getting viable life-skills.


The concept of 'How can I make a change in the world today?' inspires millions to work every day to make this a better place for all, many of them even putting their lives at risk.

Volunteering is at the heart of community development and perhaps one of the most powerful ways to engage in the life of a community, to create social connection and to develop a sense of belonging. Thus, volunteers can act as a catalyst for the people around them, prompting and helping others to take action, and helping people rise from apathy to being active citizens, engaged in the development processes that affect their lives, and the lives of their families and communities. Many people who have had to flee their home country have taken on volunteering roles in their new host countries. However, there is a dark side to the celebration of volunteering. In the context of decreased state spending, volunteers offer a form of cheap labour for service delivery. Narratives refer to local knowledge and relevant skills, but too often, it is not the skills and knowledge that are needed as much as a willingness to work for free.


The 21st century has brought new opportunities for volunteering as more and more people prefer to self-organize, as this sustains community and individual autonomy by avoiding dependence on outsiders and allows people to set their own development priorities. There are also new challenges that have arisen in a context where existing crises have not stopped, and there are new hazards including climate change and weather-related shocks. These new challenges are likely to exacerbate existing vulnerabilities and lead to new vulnerable communities sooner than we are ready for because of food insecurity, displacement, health risks, lack of access to adequate clean water and more. We have already seen this with the effects of COVID-19. In addition, we are now seeing radical global changes with radical impacts on all communities around the world. Changing technology, scarcity of resources, the way we use land, the nature of infrastructure, the way we produce and consume, and how we organise work and information flows – all this is already in a state of transition. We are at a time when our world is interconnected as never before, not regrettably by peace, prosperity, human rights and rule of law, but increasingly by conflict, and the denial of human rights, by climate change and inequality. Unprecedented challenges over the next decade will result from a growing global population and a natural environment under threat, and the unprecedented opportunities that a data rich and educated society has for engaging.


Thus there is a need for volunteering to address these challenges and to evolve to meet these challenges. This starts with a change in the dominant idea of volunteering for donor service delivery influenced from European and North American experiences. Volunteering needs to promote the development of healthy, resilient individuals who are truly able to become agents of change within their communities, beyond their services within an organization. This will be achieved when we are finally brave enough to allow volunteers to decide for themselves and tell us what they need, what we can and should do. The future of volunteering must be one driving local innovation, decision-making and accountability, delivering agendas for others identifying activities that allow volunteers to propose and engage on personally relevant, local issues.


In this sense, Volunteering also can contribute to the SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals) when established infrastructures are missing. Volunteering stands at a crossroads: one in which it is understood and promoted in terms that fit the histories and ideas of Europe and North America, or one that reflects diverse ideas and experiences, an agent for change, based on their local knowledge and capacities for innovation.


It is a time when voluntary service is needed more than ever invigorated by diversity and plurality better suited to the challenges facing the world. As the outgoing Secretary General of the United Nations has said, “Volunteerism is a source of community strength, resilience, solidarity and social cohesion. It brings about social change by fostering respect for diversity, equality and the participation of all. It is among society’s most vital asset.”


In this sense the Global Technical Meeting on Reimagining Volunteering for the 2030 Agenda co-hosted by The United Nations Volunteers (UNV) and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) from the 13-16 July is a welcome opportunity to have a discussion on what the next generation of volunteering looks like and how it can be leveraged as a transformative force for the SDGs.

This originally appeared here on New World Order